Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 09:35

Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
What’s next?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Why are so many young teenage boys misogynistic? Where do they get these attitudes from?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Thank you.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
The Unlikely Group Getting Rich Off Dave’s Hot Chicken’s $1 Billion Deal - Forbes
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
About 700 Marines being mobilized in response to LA protests - CNN
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.